[Freebase-discuss] Untyped topics and base types
jprucher at google.com
Thu Nov 11 01:02:55 UTC 2010
Thanks for creating this list, Shawn. While I was perusing it, I
discovered that there are 1437 instances of the type
/user/xtine/default_domain/farm named "Topic 0", "Topic 1", etc. that
were evidently created by a test script accidentally pointed at the
production graph. I'm going to circumvent the review queue and have
them deleted outright (unless anyone objects and would like to vote on
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 1:54 PM, Shawn Simister <narphorium at gmail.com> wrote:
> Moving this over from the experts list..
> On 11/6/2010 11:41 AM, Tom Morris wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 3:05 PM, Faye Harris<fayeharris at google.com> wrote:
>>> I'm curious
>>> if anyone has looked at data that has only base type(s) and no Commons
>>> type, because those tend to be a lot less useful in reconciliation,
>>> etc. even if they get counted as typed.
>> Those won't count as untyped for my Untyped app (or, I suspect, the
>> stats). I don't know how many things fall into this category
>> off-hand, but it doesn't seem like it should be very many since it
>> should only happen for a) broken schema that don't have the
>> appropriate commons types included or b) broken bulk loaders that
>> forgot to add the included types from the schema.
>> They shouldn't be that hard to count if there's a suspicion that they
>> actually represent a significant number of topics.
> As of the latest data dump (Nov. 5) there were 136,318 topics that met this
> criteria. I've compiled a list of the 5,048 types that are involved and how
> frequently each one appears.
> Looks like there are a couple candidates for promotion to the commons. Some
> of the law related types have already been proposed I think.
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the
> Freebase-discuss mailing list.
> To post a message to the list: Freebase-discuss at freebase.com
> To unsubscribe, view archives, etc:
More information about the Freebase-discuss