<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Kirrily Robert wrote:
<blockquote
cite="mid:b08e1490709090108o1b8f4258gfa3939d5e224bc6f@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">On 9/9/07, Shawn Simister <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:narphorium@gmail.com"><narphorium@gmail.com></a> wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap=""> From what I've seen, the discussion areas in the type descriptions are
often where people discuss those sorts of things.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
That's all very well for existing, clearly defined types, but what if
one wishes to have a broad-ranging philosophical discussion that
encompasses more than one type, or a theoretical one covering a type
that doesn't yet exist?
K.
</pre>
</blockquote>
I agree that the discussion pages really limit the range and the
audience of such discussions but I haven't found anything else yet that
covers those sorts of topics.<br>
I suppose a mailing list for information architects and domain
specialist would be useful.<br>
<br>
Shawn<br>
</body>
</html>