[Developers] Hierarchical included types

[Iain Sproat]

Thanks Tom, I've now included 'project focus' to the 3 or 4 types I'm admin
of.
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 7:44 PM, Tom Morris <tfmorris at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 4:36 AM, Philip Kendall
> <philip-freebase at shadowmagic.org.uk> wrote:
> > On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 10:30:14AM -0700, Kirrily Robert wrote:
> >>
> >> I *think* that the hierarchy-walking happens in the schema editor,
> >> when you add included types.  So with the situation you just
> >> described, since project focus came after sports facility was
> >> designed, we need to go back and add project focus as an included type
> >> to sports facility (and anything else that had structure as an
> >> included type).
> >
> > [{
> ... [MQL query elided] ...
> > }]
> >
> > gives some likely candidates for this :-)
>
> There's a table of the 45 types at
>
> http://www.freebase.com/view/user/tfmorris/default_domain/views/structures_not_project_focus
> if someone wants to clean them up by hand.
>
> If someone wants a little MQL exercise though, it might be worth doing
> a sweep of the entire type hierarchy (oops not hierarchy,
> included_type tree) to look for inconsistencies.  This is unlikely to
> be the only example.
>
> Tom
> _______________________________________________
> Developers mailing list
> Developers at freebase.com
> http://lists.freebase.com/mailman/listinfo/developers
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.freebase.com/pipermail/developers/attachments/20090529/c0e822f6/attachment.htm