[Developers] Property or Document?
Christopher Dummy
christopher.dummy at gmail.com
Wed Feb 6 23:27:48 UTC 2008
The reason I had decided on "Summary" instead of the article, can be
seen in an example of a radio station.
If you look at "Radio Alice", http://freebase.com/view/en/kllc
You can see that the summary is a much shorter "info" or "blurb" about
the station. But, the article has a complete history about the
station. The history is useful to have, but not really what you would
be reading if you were trying to find an interesting station to listen
to.
On Jan 25, 2008 1:12 PM, Ed Laurent <spatial.db at gmail.com> wrote:
> I am also interested in being able to mark a text property as equivalent to
> the article. In my case, I want to store products by a production number but
> search for them through a short text description.
>
> -Ed
>
>
>
>
>
> On Jan 25, 2008 1:50 PM, John Giannandrea <jg at metaweb.com> wrote:
>
> >
> > Arthur, you should use whatever works best for your app. Long
> > documents should definitely go in the blob store, but short ones can
> > go either way.
> >
> > From our side, we much prefer that you put text blobs in the content
> > store and use the /common/document type.
> > The idea is that a document can remain static while its content
> > property is versioned.
> > In general the /common/document schema is intended to mirror RSS and
> > Atom, and is the basis for our discussion system.
> >
> > In addition to search, we also support rich text editing of these in
> > our UI.
> >
> > Being able to mark a text property as equivalent for the article (e.g.
> > in autocomplete and such) is a god idea and we will think about it.
> >
> > -jg
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Jan 25, 2008, at 9:10 AM, Arthur van Hoff wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > All our broadcast objects (/user/cotton/default_domain/broadcast)
> > > have a summary property of type text which holds a plain text
> > > summary for the broadcast. For Podcasts this is the description of
> > > the podcast that is retrieved from the RSS feed.
> > >
> > > Instead of using the summary field we could also use the /common/
> > > topic/article property to store the summary as an external document.
> > > This has the advantage that the summary would be displayed in
> > > various lists, and it will be used to improve search.
> > >
> > > What is the right solution here? Property or document? Or both?
> > >
> > > By the way, I prefer having the summary as a property because it is
> > > easier to store and retrieve from the database. Ideally I would want
> > > to mark the property in some way so that it is displayed in lists,
> > > and used during search.
> > >
> > > Have fun,
> > >
> > > Arthur van Hoff
> > >
> > > ___________________________________________
> > > Arthur van Hoff, Dell-ZING, CTO Software and Services.
> > > W: 650-267-2413, F: 650-267-2498, M: 650-283-0842
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Developers mailing list
> > > Developers at freebase.com
> > > http://lists.freebase.com/mailman/listinfo/developers
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Developers mailing list
> > Developers at freebase.com
> > http://lists.freebase.com/mailman/listinfo/developers
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Developers mailing list
> Developers at freebase.com
> http://lists.freebase.com/mailman/listinfo/developers
>
>
--
Christopher Cotton
Zing/Dell Engineer
http://zing.net/
More information about the Developers
mailing list