[Developers] Question about the backend software and data

[Shawn Simister]

I've just put together a first attempt at representing the Freebase type 
system as OWL ontologies. There's still some work to be done but I 
figured I'd give you guys an update and hopefully get some feedback on 
how I'm modeling these domains in OWL.

You can download it at 
http://www.simister.ca/temp/freebase-owl-03-10-07.zip. The way that it's 
set up right now is one OWL ontology per file per Freebase domain. Let 
me know what you think.

Shawn

Kavitha Srinivas wrote:
> Not really, am in interested in modeling issues rather than a specific 
> domain.  Thanks!
> Kavitha
>
> On Sep 30, 2007, at 4:24 PM, Shawn Simister wrote:
>
>> I'm just putting together a new version of the ontology now which I 
>> will make available on my website. Is there a particular domain that 
>> you want to see? Right now I'm just focusing on the 67 or so main 
>> Freebase domains.
>>
>> Shawn
>>
>> Kavitha Srinivas wrote:
>>> Is Shawn's OWL ontology available somewhere?
>>> Kavitha
>>>
>>> On Sep 28, 2007, at 9:52 PM, John Giannandrea wrote:
>>>
>>>   
>>>> Kirrily Robert wrote:
>>>>     
>>>>> To me, RDF sounds like it meets those criteria.
>>>>>       
>>>> I agree that an RDF dump of the data makes sense.
>>>> There are important details though, like how to represent
>>>> the schema.  Shawn Simister previously posted about
>>>> creating an OWL ontology from the freebase types, rather
>>>> than using RDF Schema, which seemed sensible.
>>>>
>>>> The key point was that Shawn was able to extract the data
>>>> and turn it into those formats, using HTTP, MQL and JSON.
>>>>
>>>> -jg
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Developers mailing list
>>>> Developers at freebase.com
>>>> http://lists.freebase.com/mailman/listinfo/developers
>>>>     
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Developers mailing list
>>> Developers at freebase.com
>>> http://lists.freebase.com/mailman/listinfo/developers
>>>
>>>   
>>
>