<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 12:24 AM, Robert Cook <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:robert@metaweb.com">robert@metaweb.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div class="im">On Jul 1, 2009, at 12:40 PM, Kirrily Robert wrote:<br></div>
<div class="im"><br>
> Digicams: [snip] </div></blockquote><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;"><div class="im"> I've got another one on mobile phones:</div>
<a href="http://www.freebase.com/type/schema/user/robert/mobile_phones/mobile_phone?domain=%2Fuser%2Frobert%2Fmobile_phones" target="_blank">http://www.freebase.com/type/schema/user/robert/mobile_phones/mobile_phone?domain=%2Fuser%2Frobert%2Fmobile_phones</a><br>
<br>
Both of these domains have a lot of support types. I'm a bit worried<br>
if they were unified into a single mega-domain it would have hundreds<br>
if not thousands of types.</blockquote><div><br></div><div>I think the generic technical types in mobile phones and digicams (battery, antenna, band/encoding, sensor type) are possible candidates for the engineering domain.</div>
<div><br></div><div>Iain</div></div></div>