this is a really great schema, <br>maybe it could also be used to model weaponry, warboats, awarded-medals, military strategies...<br><br>also, hmm.. could we maybe use a 'war' type? <br>i get how its being done now, and while i usually like it when people make use of the event type, i think that the war-to-military conflict relationship warrants its own typing maybe? as they share the 'why' data about a war- so queries like how many military people are still alive from ww2 are one step easier - speeches, protests are also 'events included' in ww2 ... so maybe a 'war' type?<br>
i dont know. thats a tough call. i like how currently we can say w<span id="ID1001" class="prop-content-row">illiam Ernest Staton </span>participated in conflict -WW2 , if we dont know which exact battles. <br>'included in event' is always a little vague.<br>
so err, tricky one. what do others think about this issue?<br>