<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META NAME="Generator" CONTENT="MS Exchange Server version 6.5.7653.38">
<TITLE>RE: [Data-modeling] Human Anatomy commons?</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<!-- Converted from text/plain format -->
<P><FONT SIZE=2>A human anatomy schema would be fantastic. There is a nice<BR>
ontology out of U Wash (and I'm sure there are other good ones):<BR>
<BR>
<A HREF="http://sig.biostr.washington.edu/projects/fm/AboutFM.html">http://sig.biostr.washington.edu/projects/fm/AboutFM.html</A><BR>
<BR>
Might be worthwhile to investigate their work and possibly leverage<BR>
this existing ontology.<BR>
<BR>
Regards,<BR>
Dan<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
-----Original Message-----<BR>
From: data-modeling-bounces@freebase.com on behalf of Faye Harris<BR>
Sent: Mon 11/3/2008 3:59 PM<BR>
To: Freebase data modeling mailing list<BR>
Subject: [Data-modeling] Human Anatomy commons?<BR>
<BR>
Hi,<BR>
<BR>
The Medicine commons currently has a bunch of types about human anatomy<BR>
that don't quite belong there. I'd like to propose that we establish a<BR>
new Human Anatomy commons and move them there. Types I would suggest as<BR>
part of this new data commons are:<BR>
<BR>
Anatomical structure<BR>
Artery<BR>
Biofluid<BR>
Bone<BR>
Brain Structure<BR>
Cranial nerve<BR>
Hormone<BR>
Ligament<BR>
Muscle<BR>
Nerve<BR>
Vein<BR>
<BR>
Comments?<BR>
<BR>
-- Faye<BR>
<BR>
_______________________________________________<BR>
Data-modeling mailing list<BR>
Data-modeling@freebase.com<BR>
<A HREF="http://lists.freebase.com/mailman/listinfo/data-modeling">http://lists.freebase.com/mailman/listinfo/data-modeling</A><BR>
<BR>
</FONT>
</P>
</BODY>
</HTML>