[Data-modeling] the commons / non distinction is a farce

[Spencer Kelly]

On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 3:20 PM, Stefano Mazzocchi<stefano at metaweb.com> wrote:
> Say it were and you were in charge of making it happen: how would you do
> it?

if i were king of freebase, i would decree:
'No types shall be createth in the commons'

Metaweb empoyees would have to make their types in bases, and all
types will be evaluated for promotion according to something like
http://nominate.freebaseapps.com/
(not working yet)



On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 7:05 PM, Robert Cook<robert at metaweb.com> wrote:
> I think the question is whether schemas that aren't stable enough to be in
> commons should be displayed on the "read-only" topic view.  They probably
> should be, but I'm not sure if it's worth introducing an extra level of
> complexity.
agree.