[Data-modeling] Innovator and Original Idea

Iain Sproat iainsproat at gmail.com
Sat Jul 11 00:58:28 UTC 2009


I think Influence would be the most appropriate commons as these are novel
ideas which have had a large influence; and arguments are to do with
influencing others (also the influence commons is pretty sparse on schema at
the moment.)
Original Idea<http://www.freebase.com/type/schema/base/argumentmaps/original_idea?domain=/base/argumentmaps>would
probably benefit from a phylogeny pattern to model which ideas then
influenced other ideas, and which ideas it was based on.  (or is that the
purpose of variation_of_idea? variation_of_idea appears to me more like a
competing idea - e.g. flat world vs. circumnavigation).

A nice-to-have would be 'Advocates' and 'Opponents' properties on Original
Idea.  A lot of ideas are controversial and it would be good to model which
people agreed and disagreed.

Iain

On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 4:17 AM, Faye Harris <faye at metaweb.com> wrote:

> I think Spencer's "Innovator" and "Original Idea" are great types. It's
> a step forward in capturing contributions by scientists and social
> scientists.
>
> I would love to promote them to the Commons. Neither Jeff nor I,
> however, could think of to what Domain they should be promoted. Also, is
> there any other property "Innovator" should have?
>
> http://www.freebase.com/view/base/argumentmaps/innovator
> http://www.freebase.com/view/base/argumentmaps/original_idea <
> http://www.freebase.com/view/base/argumentmaps/original_idea>
>
>
> -- Faye
>
>
> Spencer Kelly wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 9:21 PM, Faye Harris <faye at metaweb.com
> > <mailto:faye at metaweb.com>> wrote:
> >
> >     They develop theories, and a property here will finally link
> >     /en/albert_einstein to /en/theory_of_relativity in Freebase, thus
> >     uniting two inseparable scientific entities.
> >
> >
> > i know this is just an example, but im trying to map this stuff
> > already with
> http://www.freebase.com/view/base/argumentmaps/original_idea
> > if thats the only property, we maybe dont need a physicist type (yet).
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Data-modeling mailing list
> > Data-modeling at freebase.com
> > http://lists.freebase.com/mailman/listinfo/data-modeling
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Data-modeling mailing list
> Data-modeling at freebase.com
> http://lists.freebase.com/mailman/listinfo/data-modeling
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.freebase.com/pipermail/data-modeling/attachments/20090711/7a17c893/attachment-0001.htm 


More information about the Data-modeling mailing list