[Data-modeling] RSS feeds constrained by user

[Faye Harris]

I would find (A) more useful than (B). I don't need to see my own edits 
because I know what they are. Just because several other people are 
entrusted with the task of administering the same domain doesn't mean I 
assume their data input to be uninteresting. :)

Besides, (A) is more generic. It can be used to filter out any user, 
including a member, expert, or admin of the domain. If "not_user" can 
take a list of values, then the equivalent of "not_admin" can be 
achieved by putting all admins (usually less than 4) on the "not_user" list.

-- Faye


Jeff Fry wrote:
> I've been making lots of edits to a base recently, and would love to 
> have an RSS feed of changed made to it by folks /other/ than me. We were 
> discussing this a bit in the office, and it seems like it would likely 
> be doable to offer
> either:
> (A) a feed of changed that weren't by user X, something like 
> http://madman.freebase.com/feed/history/all/base/madman?not_user=/user/jfry 
> , or
> (B) a feed of changes by anyone that wasn't an admin of the domain, 
> something like 
> http://madman.freebase.com/feed/history/all/base/madman?not_admin 
> <http://madman.freebase.com/feed/history/all/base/madman?not_user=/user/jfry>
>
> Would either of these be useful to you? One more than the other?
>
> Jeff
> _______________________________________________
> Data-modeling mailing list
> Data-modeling at freebase.com
> http://lists.freebase.com/mailman/listinfo/data-modeling
>
>