[Data-modeling] Military Unit
Iain Sproat
iainsproat at gmail.com
Wed Apr 8 07:41:26 UTC 2009
I second that.
Having had a look at the schema, I don't think Military unit really needs a
seperate type - a unit is itself an armed force which is a subdivision of a
larger armed force. (In fact a lot of topics currently typed as 'armed
force' are actually units in our current definition, and a cleanup would be
required)
If Armed Force had a 'formed', 'disbanded' and 'size designation' (dated)
properties then the Military unit type is obsolete and we would be able to
use Armed Force in its place.
Iain
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 7:55 AM, Anne Semana <nsemana at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Can we add military unit to the CVT /military/military_service? Joan Marie
> Engel is the director of United States Navy Nurse Corps. I would like to
> link the rank to the military unit "United States Navy Nurse Corps".
>
> http://www.freebase.com/view/en/joan_marie_engel
>
> http://www.freebase.com/view/en/united_states_navy_nurse_corps
>
> Since the Military Person schema only allows the Military force where the
> person belongs and not the military unit, I just entered United States Navy
> instead of United States Navy Nurse Corps.
>
> That would also be useful to show people who were members of the army
> rangers or navy seals.
>
> Thanks,
> Anne
>
> --
> Anne Semana
>
> _______________________________________________
> Data-modeling mailing list
> Data-modeling at freebase.com
> http://lists.freebase.com/mailman/listinfo/data-modeling
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.freebase.com/pipermail/data-modeling/attachments/20090408/0ba97e6f/attachment.htm
More information about the Data-modeling
mailing list