[Data-modeling] Human Anatomy commons?

[Faye Harris]

Dan,

Wow, thanks for alerting us to this extensive human anatomy ontology. 
I'm quite impressed by the Foundational Model Explorer:

http://fme.biostr.washington.edu:8089/FME/index.html

BTW, are you familiar with the people behind this project? I couldn't 
find anything regarding licensing or data usage on their web site.

-- Faye



Dan Ruderman wrote:
>
> A human anatomy schema would be fantastic.  There is a nice
> ontology out of U Wash (and I'm sure there are other good ones):
>
> http://sig.biostr.washington.edu/projects/fm/AboutFM.html
>
> Might be worthwhile to investigate their work and possibly leverage
> this existing ontology.
>
> Regards,
> Dan
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: data-modeling-bounces at freebase.com on behalf of Faye Harris
> Sent: Mon 11/3/2008 3:59 PM
> To: Freebase data modeling mailing list
> Subject: [Data-modeling] Human Anatomy commons?
>
> Hi,
>
> The Medicine commons currently has a bunch of types about human anatomy
> that don't quite belong there. I'd like to propose that we establish a
> new Human Anatomy commons and move them there. Types I would suggest as
> part of this new data commons are:
>
> Anatomical structure
> Artery
> Biofluid
> Bone
> Brain Structure
> Cranial nerve
> Hormone
> Ligament
> Muscle
> Nerve
> Vein
>
> Comments?
>
> -- Faye
>
> _______________________________________________
> Data-modeling mailing list
> Data-modeling at freebase.com
> http://lists.freebase.com/mailman/listinfo/data-modeling
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Data-modeling mailing list
> Data-modeling at freebase.com
> http://lists.freebase.com/mailman/listinfo/data-modeling
>