[Data-modeling] Astronomy: Celestial Objects and Natural Satellites
Gordon Mackenzie
gordon at metaweb.com
Sat May 3 01:10:18 UTC 2008
Metapsyche and I did some work a while back to add more useful
properties for his exoplanet type and I am considering moving most of
those properties to Celestial Object and adding planet as a co-type.
Celestial Object is our workhorse of a generic Astronomical Object
type that is included by Star, Planet, Natural Satellite, Asteroid,
Comet types. I'm unsure what specifically to retain within exoplanet,
pretty much most of the non-celestial object bound properties could be
placed within the Planet type. Exoplanet could be just a boolean true/
false for is this planet an exoplanet for that matter.
So Celestial Object would have added specifically:
Discoverer, Discovery Date, Discovery Method, Discovery status,
Discovery Institution/organization
And then remove/move the data for the related discovery properties in
Planet/Asteroid/Comet types to the equivalents in Celestial Body.
Planet type might have both jupiter and earth-based radius and mass
properties.
One question I have is whether Natural Satellites should be
individually added as a property to Planet and Asteroid types or to
add as a single property to just Celestial Object. The latter is
simpler, but the former allows cleaner demarcation of moons of
planetary bodies and asteroidal moons.
~ Gordon
<<< gordon at metaweb.com >>>
More information about the Data-modeling
mailing list