[Data-modeling] About the new authorship cvt...Is it correctly modeled/implimented?

[Jeff Prucher]

Good catch. I've changed "written work" from supporting to standard.

Jeff

> -----Original Message-----
> From: data-modeling-bounces at freebase.com 
> [mailto:data-modeling-bounces at freebase.com] On Behalf Of 
> Kirrily Robert
> Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2008 3:06 PM
> To: Freebase data modeling mailing list
> Subject: Re: [Data-modeling] About the new authorship 
> cvt...Is it correctly modeled/implimented?
> 
> 
> ----- "Gordon Mackenzie" <gordon at metaweb.com> wrote:
> > http://sandbox.freebase.com/view/schema/book/authorship
> > 
> > I am not sure that this is designed correctly (or I am 
> > misunderstanding what is supposed to be a written work).
> > 
> > So I was adding some written works for Jack L Chalker when I noticed
> > 
> > that if it is a newly created topic that there are no properties for
> > 
> > the written work. This is because 'written work' is typed as a 
> > supporting type, which seems incorrect to me, should be standard.
> 
> My suspicion is that "supporting types" aren't meant to show 
> up in the UI, and that that's intentional, but it is rather 
> weird in this case.  We should probably talk to someone from 
> the UI side of things.
> 
> K.
> 
> 
> --
> Kirrily Robert
> Freebase Community Director
> kirrily at metaweb.com
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Data-modeling mailing list
> Data-modeling at freebase.com
> http://lists.freebase.com/mailman/listinfo/data-modeling
>