[Data-modeling] Visual Art Form - an enumerated type?

Faye Li faye at metaweb.com
Mon Mar 17 18:26:32 UTC 2008


I see nothing wrong with co-typing "human hair" as a visual art medium 
if it has been used in the creation of artwork (and incidentally I know 
it has). That's all the type requires. Just like a one-time performance 
in a TV show would make a person a "TV Actor", regardless of the 
person's primary profession.

I rely on the creator (or the accepted opinion of the art criticism 
circle) to call the art form if it's not obvious/traditional. A 
resin-caked gelatin print could be either a painting or a sculpture, or 
maybe something else. The data model can make no such call.

-- Faye


Nick Thompson wrote:
> Faye Li wrote:
>   
>> I agree. :) It's such a great idea it was implemented a long time ago: 
>> "visual art medium", instances of which includes "oil paint", "acrylic 
>> paint", "watercolor paint", etc.
>>     
>
> hmm, i was thinking of something more general than "what kind of paint",
> which is why i mentioned "marble" as a possible medium.  not to mention 
> "cigarette butts", "human hair", etc.  this avoids the question of how
> many layers of resin you have to put on top of a photograph before it's
> a "sculpture" instead of a "painting", and doesn't suggest that
> "cigarette butt" should be co-typed as "visual art medium".
>
>      nick
>
>
>   
>> -- Faye
>>
>>
>> Nick Thompson wrote:
>>     
>>> it seems like a "media" property for works of art (e.g. "oil paints",
>>> "silver gelatin print", and/or "marble") is probably more expressive than
>>> trying to build types for paintings, sculptures, etc and arrange them
>>> in some sort of type hierarchy.   there's a lot of mixed-media work
>>> out there.
>>>
>>>      nick
>>>
>>> Jeff Prucher wrote:
>>>   
>>>       
>>>> That's a good question. It seems like the art form type is pretty broad;
>>>> i.e., it includes not only sculpture but also relief and bas-relief. I
>>>> thought at first that this type was only used for the very high-level
>>>> artform (e.g., sculpture, painting, photogrpahy, etc.), in which case an
>>>> enumeration would make more sense -- there are probably only a couple dozen
>>>> or so such options.  But since the type really does seem to include varying
>>>> levels of specificity, I'd be inclined to say that it shouldn't be an
>>>> enumeration, either.
>>>>
>>>> This also raises the question of whether this type needs a phylogeny
>>>> pattern. I.e., a pair of parent/child or superclass/subclass properties.  So
>>>> we could say that "bas-relief" is a variety of "relief" which is itself a
>>>> variety of "sculpture".
>>>>
>>>> Jeff Prucher
>>>>
>>>>     
>>>>         
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: data-modeling-bounces at freebase.com 
>>>>> [mailto:data-modeling-bounces at freebase.com] On Behalf Of Bobby Rullo
>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2008 6:22 PM
>>>>> To: Freebase data modeling mailing list
>>>>> Subject: [Data-modeling] Visual Art Form - an enumerated type?
>>>>>
>>>>> Should Visual Art Form be an enumeration? The client doesn't 
>>>>> allow you to add types which are enumerations when you click 
>>>>> "Add a Type", and this seems like something that changes 
>>>>> relatively frequently.
>>>>>
>>>>> Bobby
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Data-modeling mailing list
>>>>> Data-modeling at freebase.com
>>>>> http://lists.freebase.com/mailman/listinfo/data-modeling
>>>>>
>>>>>       
>>>>>           
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Data-modeling mailing list
>>>> Data-modeling at freebase.com
>>>> http://lists.freebase.com/mailman/listinfo/data-modeling
>>>>     
>>>>         
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Data-modeling mailing list
>>> Data-modeling at freebase.com
>>> http://lists.freebase.com/mailman/listinfo/data-modeling
>>>
>>>   
>>>       
>> _______________________________________________
>> Data-modeling mailing list
>> Data-modeling at freebase.com
>> http://lists.freebase.com/mailman/listinfo/data-modeling
>>     
> _______________________________________________
> Data-modeling mailing list
> Data-modeling at freebase.com
> http://lists.freebase.com/mailman/listinfo/data-modeling
>
>   



More information about the Data-modeling mailing list