[Data-modeling] A proposal for consumer products

Tue Dec 23 20:31:21 UTC 2008

Perhaps add to this Product Type so you can link to toothpaste, software,
car, phone, etc?  So you separate "Toohpaste" from the "Crest Toothpaste".
just an idea.

In response to Cook, I think why it would be good to have a "generic"
consumer product type is for products that haven't been specifically typed
yet.  Perhaps for computers there's a specific computer type, and same for
books, etc.  But if you wanted to capture who makes toothpaste, and the
various types of toothpastes, you could use this general product type.

On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 3:17 PM, Kirrily Robert <kirrily at metaweb.com> wrote:

> OK, how about this.  Four types:
> * Company (or some company-like type, eg. Product manufacturer, intended as
> a co-type with company)
> * Brand
> * Product line
> * Consumer Product
>
> All four of those have properties for the other three.  Brand and Product
> Line have a phylogeny pattern which allows for "Includes" and "Included by".
>
> Apple is a company.  It has a brand "iPhone", which is also a product line
> (done with co-typing the iPhone topic).  The iPhone 3G 8GB is a product
> whose brand and product line are iPhone.  As an example of the phylogeny
> pattern Apple's brand "iPod" includes a sub-brand "iPod Shuffle".
>
> P&G is a company, which has a brands "Crest" and "Charmin".  It has product
> lines "Crest toothpaste", "Crest toothbrushes", etc.  "Crest Whitening Minty
> Fresh Toothpaste" (I made that name up) is a product in the Crest toothpaste
> line, with the Crest brand.
>
> Adobe is a company that has a lot of products, but looking at
> http://www.adobe.com/products/ I can't see much in the way of brands other
> than the Adobe brand itself.  But they do have product lines like "Creative
> Suite".
>
> For very small companies or producers, you can ignore Product Line and
> Brand.  For instance, Joe Smith builds "Joe's worm farms" and sells them at
> his local farmers market.  There is no Product Line or Brand there, just a
> producer and a product.
>
> Having links from all those four types to each other will introduce some
> denormalisation, but it seems to me like the only way to capture the various
> ways these things work in different industries.
>
> K.
>
>
> On Dec 23, 2008, at 11:39 AM, evening0star wrote:
>
>
> Appliances, however, don't line up as easily.  Take Siemens and GE, who
> both make refrigerators.  GE has a couple of different lines (which they
> call Brands), like GE Profile, GE Monogram, etc:
> http://www.geappliances.com/products/brands/.  So if we use GE Profile,
> you'll see that there are side-by-side refrigerators, top-freezer models,
> etc.  And then within those categories you have specific products, or
> models, like the "GE Profile 42" Built-In Side-by-Side Refrigerator with
> Dispenser" model # PSB42YSXSS, and there's another one "GE Profile™ 42"
> Built-In Side-by-Side Refrigerator with Dispenser" but model # PSB42YGXSV.
>
> Siemens, however, doesn't seem to have multiple models per type of
> refrigerator (for lack of a better way to put it).  They have a 36"
> counter-depth, a 36" french door, etc:
> http://www.siemens-home.com/Appliances-Kitchen-Cooking_Refrigerators-Freezers.
>
>
> Then take a look at Mitsubishi Electric's home theater TVs:
> http://mitsubishi-tv.com.  These are similar to Siemens in that they
> have more than one model for a "46" Diamond Premium Flat Panel TV".
>
> Of course there's also software, and Adobe is an "easy" example.
> http://www.adobe.com/products/
>
> And, frankly, I'm afraid to look into food products! :)  Though I can give
> you one example I ran into the other day: Vermont Smoke & Cure is a food
> brand that is owned by Farmer's Diner, and has various products within the
> Smoke & Cure name (here's a link to their bacon:
> http://www.vtsmokeandcure.com/bacon-natural-c-249.html).
>
> So I hope these examples help people think about modeling this area.  What
> is the brand for each of these, versus the product, versus the company,
> versus specific models, etc.  And then maybe we can start referencing
> specific examples so we can talk on the same page (like brand).
>
> evening
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 8:55 PM, Robert Cook <robert at metaweb.com> wrote:
>
>> OK, I think we're trying to represent the "brand" more than the branding.
>>  Apple, Dell, Chevrolet, Mentos, Levalor are all brands.  Some (perhaps
>> all?) are companies, but that's a co-type on the same topics.
>> I should have been clearer about Apple as designer, which although often
>> is the same as the brand (if it's a company or .  I don't think that's part
>> of brand at all.  That's probably a property into itself (should one want to
>> split that far.)  Several car models have designers who are recognizable
>> people.
>>
>> R
>>
>>  On Dec 22, 2008, at 1:28 PM, evening0star wrote:
>>
>>  Well, there's a brand, and then there's branding.  The branding on
>> Chevrolet has changed over the years (colors and fonts used, tag lines,
>> logos,etc), but the brand/division/product of Chevrolet hasn't in the sense
>> that it hasn't changed names, still is basically the same kind of product,
>> etc.
>>
>>
>> *> Apple is the brand for the Macbook  They are also the designer.  They
>> are definitely not the manufacturer.*
>>
>>
>> We have to be careful between brand and company.   "Apple Inc" is the
>> company that makes/designs/owns these products.  A brand can't design things
>> - it is a representation of a company or product/service.
>>
>> Are we having fun yet?? :)
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 4:17 PM, Tim Kientzle <tim at metaweb.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Some of the clearest examples come from the car industry: "Chevrolet"
>>> is a brand owned by the General Motors Corporation.  "Chevrolet" is
>>> not a company nor is it a particular product.  (But, of course,
>>> "Suburban" is also a brand, as is "General Motors Corporation."  The
>>> identity is not the same as the product or company, even when it has
>>> the same name.  The White Knight should have been in advertising. ;-)
>>>
>>> Tim
>>>
>>>
>>> On Dec 22, 2008, at 1:01 PM, Kirrily Robert wrote:
>>>
>>> > On Dec 22, 2008, at 12:46 PM, Mohammad Al-Ubaydli wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> Sorry if I am ignorant on this but would "Brand" be better than
>>> >> "manufacturer"? I am guessing you already went through this with
>>> >> your business guys and was just hoping to learn why the still expect
>>> >> manufacturer.
>>> >
>>> > I'd better let a marketing person explain it, but as I understand it,
>>> > a brand is a marketing device and is not the same as the company.
>>> >
>>> > Wikipedia describes brands as: "A brand is a collection of symbols,
>>> > experiences and associations connected with a product, a service, a
>>> > person or any other artefact or entity."  So for instance, the Coca
>>> > Cola brand involves red and white colours, the swoopy logo, the phrase
>>> > "Enjoy Coca Cola", and so on.
>>> >
>>> > See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brand and
>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Product_(business)
>>> >  for example.
>>> >
>>> > K.
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > Kirrily Robert
>>> > Freebase Community Director
>>> > kirrily at metaweb.com
>>> > http://freebase.com/
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > Data-modeling mailing list
>>> > Data-modeling at freebase.com
>>> > http://lists.freebase.com/mailman/listinfo/data-modeling
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Data-modeling mailing list
>>> Data-modeling at freebase.com
>>> http://lists.freebase.com/mailman/listinfo/data-modeling
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Data-modeling mailing list
>> Data-modeling at freebase.com
>> http://lists.freebase.com/mailman/listinfo/data-modeling
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Data-modeling mailing list
>> Data-modeling at freebase.com
>> http://lists.freebase.com/mailman/listinfo/data-modeling
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Data-modeling mailing list
> Data-modeling at freebase.com
> http://lists.freebase.com/mailman/listinfo/data-modeling
>
>
>   --
>  Kirrily Robert
> Freebase Community Director
> kirrily at metaweb.com
> http://freebase.com/
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Data-modeling mailing list
> Data-modeling at freebase.com
> http://lists.freebase.com/mailman/listinfo/data-modeling
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.freebase.com/pipermail/data-modeling/attachments/20081223/423c5249/attachment.htm 