[Data-modeling] Domain cleanup & Influence node

[Dan Milbrath]

I'm still in favor of broadening it - but I didn't hear many folks rallying to support this point of view. 

Regardless, I still think it make sense to merge this into another commons, either people or common. 
I think the argument could be made that since influence node is most often referring to people it would be fine to put there.





----- Original Message -----
From: "Jeff Prucher" <jeff at metaweb.com>
To: "Freebase data modeling mailing list" <data-modeling at freebase.com>
Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2008 12:10:06 PM GMT -08:00 US/Canada Pacific
Subject: Re: [Data-modeling] Domain cleanup & Influence node

If, as is being suggested downthread, influence node is broadened to more
than just people, does it still make sense to merge it into the people
domain?

Jeff

> -----Original Message-----
> From: data-modeling-bounces at freebase.com 
> [mailto:data-modeling-bounces at freebase.com] On Behalf Of Bryan Cheung
> Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2008 11:56 AM
> To: Freebase data modeling mailing list
> Subject: [Data-modeling] Domain cleanup
> 
> Cross-post from dev list:
> http://lists.freebase.com/pipermail/developers/2008-December/0
02349.html
> _______________________________________________
> Data-modeling mailing list
> Data-modeling at freebase.com
> http://lists.freebase.com/mailman/listinfo/data-modeling
> 

_______________________________________________
Data-modeling mailing list
Data-modeling at freebase.com
http://lists.freebase.com/mailman/listinfo/data-modeling