[Data-modeling] Publishing Companies

evening0star evening0star at gmail.com
Sun Dec 14 23:14:54 UTC 2008


I've tried cleaning up those cases also, and wondered what the best
thing to do is.  I believe in most if not all cases these are people
from "long ago" where they could be a "self publisher" or an
entreprenuer publisher (or whatever).  Perhaps in those cases
Profession=Publisher is enough (or whatever else may be appropriate)?

I agree that making the title more descriptive is good.  If it is
designed for just companies, then it should say so.

evening


On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 1:37 PM, Shawn Simister <narphorium at gmail.com> wrote:
> I was doing some clean-up of people who were incorrectly co-typed as
> companies and I found several instances where a person was typed as a
> Publisher. At first glance this seems like the right thing to do except
> that the Publisher type includes the Company type which means that that
> person is now also a company. It made me wonder whether it might be
> worthwhile to change the name of the type to Publishing Company and keep
> publisher as a Job Title to prevent any more confusion of the two
> similar but separate meanings of the word.
>
> Shawn
>
> _______________________________________________
> Data-modeling mailing list
> Data-modeling at freebase.com
> http://lists.freebase.com/mailman/listinfo/data-modeling
>


More information about the Data-modeling mailing list